Expert perspectives. A little closer.
Browse the reelsUK R&D tax relief Expert insight
What HMRC wishes all businesses understood.
What does HMRC expect a business to understand before it claims? Start with the guidance, the project and the connection between qualifying work and costs.
Playing connects to YouTube. Use the player for sound, captions and fullscreen.
About this reel
First, HMRC expects claimants to have read and understood the official R&D tax relief guidelines.
These guidelines are designed to help businesses make a clear and informed assessment of whether their projects genuinely qualify. They explain the relationship between qualifying activity and the specific costs that can be included within a claim.
This means businesses should be able to:
• Explain why each project meets the qualifying criteria
• Identify the scientific or technological advance being sought
• Demonstrate the uncertainties that had to be overcome
• Link qualifying expenditure directly to the relevant R&D activity
• Distinguish eligible costs from ordinary business expenditure
HMRC does not expect businesses to simply include standard operating costs or submit speculative amounts. A claim should be supported by a clear technical rationale and an accurate breakdown of the qualifying expenditure.
Reading the guidance and applying it carefully makes it much easier to prepare a robust, compliant claim and reduces the risk of including costs that do not qualify.
For help connecting your project evidence and qualifying costs, explore our R&D tax relief claim service.
The collection
A question worth exploring.
Short conversations on qualifying innovation, stronger claims and HMRC.
-
01In the playerWhat HMRC wishes all businesses understood.
InnoFund
-
02In the playerWhat is the difference between innovation and R&D?
Simba Mareverwa
-
03In the playerCan your accountant defend an R&D enquiry?
Simba Mareverwa
-
04In the playerAre legitimate R&D tax relief claims rejected by HMRC?
Simba Mareverwa
No reels match that search. Try “HMRC”, “innovation” or “accountant”.
