Book a consultation
Explore InnoFund

Sector innovation

Innovation in Engineering

Engineering innovation can take place across product design, prototyping, process development, materials, manufacturing, software, automation, energy efficiency, safety, scale-up and complex systems integration. Qualifying R&D may arise where a business is not simply applying known engineering methods, but is developing or adapting technology because the outcome cannot be readily predicted by competent professionals in the field.

This includes work across:

  • Product design and prototyping
  • Process improvement
  • Materials innovation
  • Mechanical engineering
  • Electrical engineering
  • Systems engineering
  • Automation and robotics
  • AI and IoT integration
  • Energy efficiency
  • Safety and compliance systems
  • Scale-up and testing
  • Manufacturing optimisation

Engineering R&D is often found in the practical detail of testing, iteration, tolerances, performance limits and systems behaviour, especially where known methods do not deliver the required outcome.

Speak with a consultant
Engineering innovation activity that may qualify for R&D Tax Credits

Qualifying R&D

How Engineering Companies Can Qualify for R&D Tax Credits

Engineering companies may qualify for R&D Tax Credits where they are seeking an advance in science or technology and have to overcome technical uncertainty. Qualifying activity can arise across product development, prototyping, materials, manufacturing, control systems, automation, software, testing, energy efficiency and systems integration.

  • Designing and Prototyping New Products or Systems R&D may arise where an engineering company is designing, developing or prototyping a new product, component, machine or system with improved performance, functionality, reliability or efficiency. The qualifying work sits in the technical uncertainty around how to achieve the required outcome, not simply in producing a new commercial product.
  • Improving Manufacturing and Engineering Processes Engineering businesses may qualify where they are developing new or improved processes to increase efficiency, reduce waste, improve quality, lower cost or solve production constraints. This could include work on tooling, automation, workflow, tolerances, repeatability, process control or manufacturing defects.
  • Developing or Testing New Materials Materials innovation can involve qualifying R&D where a company is developing, selecting or adapting materials to improve strength, durability, weight, resistance, conductivity, flexibility or cost-efficiency. The work may involve testing alternative materials, composites, coatings or treatments where the performance outcome is uncertain.
  • Developing Control Systems, Software and Automation Engineering R&D often includes the development of software, algorithms, control systems, robotics or automation tools. Projects may qualify where the business is creating or adapting systems to improve precision, speed, monitoring, safety, interoperability or process efficiency beyond standard configuration.
  • Improving Energy Efficiency and Environmental Performance R&D may arise where a business is developing systems, products or processes that reduce energy consumption, emissions, material waste or environmental impact. The project must involve technical uncertainty, such as testing new designs, processes or technology combinations to achieve the required performance.
  • Scaling Up, Testing and Integrating Complex Systems Engineering projects may qualify where a company is scaling up prototypes, testing performance, validating designs or integrating complex systems. Technical uncertainty can arise when a solution works at small scale but behaves differently in production, real-world use or when connected with other systems.
Discuss your R&D activity

A note from Simba Mareverwa

Engineering R&D Claims Need to Explain the Technical Problem Clearly

Engineering claims can be strong, but they must be built around the right evidence. A project may involve a new product, improved process, better component or more efficient system, but HMRC will want to understand the specific technical uncertainty that had to be resolved.

That uncertainty may sit in performance, durability, tolerances, materials, system behaviour, manufacturability, automation, software integration, safety, energy use, reliability or scale-up. A compliant claim needs to explain what the business was trying to advance, why existing engineering knowledge was not enough, and what testing, design iteration or development work was carried out.

Simba Mareverwa, InnoFund's Head of Compliance and Tax Disputes, helps ensure engineering R&D claims are reviewed with compliance at the centre. His focus is making sure claims are not built around broad claims of innovation or project complexity, but around clear technical evidence, eligible activity, competent professional input and defensible methodology.

Simba Mareverwa
  • CEDR accredited
  • ICAEW Chartered Accountant
  • R&D Community — Certified in R&D Tax Relief, Gold award (December 2025)

Simba Mareverwa

Head of Tax Compliance & HMRC Disputes

  • 20+ years in corporation tax compliance, including leadership of HMRC disputes.
  • Extensive experience defending UK R&D Tax Credit claims under enquiry.
  • Patent Box claim and enquiry experience dating from the scheme’s introduction.
Speak to Simba Mareverwa

Client experience

Engineering Companies Recommend InnoFund

Practical support from a multidisciplinary team that understands both the technical work and the claim.

“Would highly recommend, they know their stuff! They assisted greatly with an R&D claim rejection by HMRC.”

Steven Potts

Finance Director, Sigma Polymers

“Excellent from start to finish, lovely team and a great result. Highly recommended.”

Sam Collins

General Manager, Terra Farmer

Clear boundaries

Not Every Engineering Project Qualifies for R&D Tax Credits.

Not every engineering project, prototype or process improvement will qualify for R&D Tax Credits. The key question is whether the business faced scientific or technological uncertainty and carried out systematic work to resolve it.

Examples of work that may not qualify include:

  • Routine engineering work
  • Standard product customisation
  • Normal CAD modelling
  • Routine manufacturing changes
  • Basic process optimisation
  • Off-the-shelf software setup
  • Standard quality control
  • Routine compliance testing
  • Commercial project management
  • General troubleshooting
  • Replication of known designs
  • Work after uncertainty is resolved

Engineering projects often contain a mixture of qualifying and non-qualifying activity. InnoFund helps separate routine engineering from genuine R&D so the claim is accurate, compliant and defensible.

Eligible expenditure

Eligible R&D Costs for Engineering Businesses

Engineering businesses may be able to claim relief on qualifying costs linked to eligible R&D projects, including:

  • Engineering staff time
  • Design and technical staff time
  • Technical director time
  • Employer NIC and pension costs
  • Subcontracted R&D, where eligible
  • Externally provided workers
  • Software used for modelling or testing
  • Cloud computing and data costs
  • Prototype materials and components
  • Testing and validation costs
  • Consumables used in R&D
  • Trial production costs, where eligible

The treatment of prototype materials, trial production, subcontracted work, client-funded projects, software and externally provided workers can be particularly important in engineering R&D claims.

InnoFund helps identify which costs are eligible and ensures the claim is built around the qualifying technical work, not just the wider commercial project.

Evidence & scrutiny

HMRC Risk Areas for Engineering R&D Claims

HMRC is applying greater scrutiny to R&D Tax Credit claims, including claims from engineering and manufacturing businesses. A strong claim must explain the technical uncertainty clearly and show why the work went beyond routine engineering or commercial product development.

Common risk areas include:

  • Claiming project complexity as R&D
  • Weak technical uncertainty explanation
  • No clear baseline of existing knowledge
  • Overclaiming routine engineering work
  • Treating all prototyping as qualifying
  • Incorrect subcontractor treatment
  • Claiming client-funded work incorrectly
  • Poor records of testing or iteration
  • No competent professional input
  • Failing to separate qualifying and non-qualifying activity
  • Claiming standard compliance work
  • Unclear project boundaries

InnoFund helps engineering companies prepare claims that are clear, compliant and evidence-led. We focus on the technical work behind the project, the uncertainty faced, the process followed and the costs directly connected to qualifying activity.

Assess your project

Your next step

Don't guess. Know for sure.

Got a project you want to discuss? InnoFund helps separate routine delivery from genuine R&D so that claims are accurate, compliant and properly evidenced. Speak to our innovation funding experts today.

Book a consultation
  • 30 minutes
  • Expert guidance
  • Commitment free
InnoFund adviser discussing R&D Tax Credits with a telecommunications business